![]() |
Harriet Miers |
I just love how attorney-client privledge was used to prevent people from getting answers for tough questions. This wouldn't be an issue, Bush, if you didn't put your own attorney up for the job. Man. Do you really think that Congress, and the American public, is that stupid?
It is not without precedence. His own father give an under-qualified imbecile an important job in government when he gave Dan Quail the job of VP back in 1989. He got away with it. (Although I can't help but think that Bush Sr. viewed Quail as a life insurance policy. In other words, "I'm the only thing standing between Quail and the Big-Red-Button... so you better not get rid of me.")
Now there is one thing I know about Bush. He will exact punishment for this fiasco on someone, or someones, rather than himself or his own office. He will go after those in his own party who said "WTF?" rather than "Yes Sir! How high?" when he threw his personal lawyer out there for the job. I wonder who's heads are gonna roll?
Good. Now that is over with, on to the real battle, with real contendors. No more amuture hour please!
2 comments:
Do you find it ironic that Dan Quayle (notice the spelling) was castigated by the media for mispelling the word potato in a speaking engagement and you mispelled his name on your blog while talking about the fact that his inclusion on the Republican ticket in 1988 showed poor judgement on the part of George Bush?
Thank you Boner for pointing out my mistake. I can honestly say that I allowed Spellcheck to alter that for me.
No. I do not find it is ironic. I find it coincidental.
Ironic would be true if I had declared myself as more subtible for the VP office than Dan Quayle. I did not.
Ironic would be if I claimed that I was a better speller than Quayle. I am a terrible speller. I am probably worse at it than Quayle.
Post a Comment